Tor 0.2.4.15-rc packages available

by erinn | July 9, 2013

There's a new Tor 0.2.4.15-rc out and all of the packages have been updated. This is a release candidate and will become the new Tor stable soon, so please test these extensively!

Regular packages can be found here:
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/download/download-easy.html.en

Tor Browser Bundles are here:
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/projects/torbrowser.html.en

Tor Browser Bundle (2.4.15-beta-1)

  • Update Tor to 0.2.4.15-rc
  • Update NoScript to 2.6.6.7

Comments

Please note that the comment area below has been archived.

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 09, 2013

Permalink

It seems to me that the Tor developers are censoring comments on this blog BIG TIME. Just a few months ago pretty much all comments would get approved. Now so many are not. What's going on Tor people?

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 09, 2013

Permalink

I've lost count of how many weeks it's been since I've seen a new comment posted anywhere on this blog. Unprecedented since I've been following this blog.

How about at least making a post acknowledging this and offering some explanation?

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 09, 2013

Permalink

"ALPHA: Tor Browser Bundle alpha versions for Windows (2.4.15-beta-1), Linux 32-bit (2.4.15-beta-1) and 64-bit (2.4.15-beta-1), and Intel Mac OS X 10.6 and higher (2.4.15-beta-1). "

Wait...Is this alpha or beta?

Confusing as it is presented now.

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 13, 2013

Permalink

Hello and a question:
have 0.2.4.15-rc a better,'intelligent' routing algorithm?

With 0.2.3.25 i see a lot in the same AS (e.g. OVH).
Or apparently routing preferences like x-SW-RU (read falkvinge.net).
How it works against fiveeys ubiqitous(?) netpresence?Timing attacks?

And tails developers,please introduce static Entry Guards as a choice for all.
It's a NORMAL tor security mechanism.

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 13, 2013

Permalink

Is Vidalia integrated ?
seeing the circuits seems to be a must have(-:.
Or was NSA calling ?

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 22, 2013

Permalink

How is it possible to define entry and exit policies properly? The documentation mixes the role between clients and servers up. I want to enter over a small, defined set of servers and exit over a small, defined set of servers. Is it even possible to tell TOR in advance where to exit from?

I could only find exit node lists, but no entry node lists.

If I do this in the torrc:
ExitPolicy accept IP1, accept IP2, accept IP3, reject *:*

Then nothing happens and I still have many different IPs not similar to the three above.

Sorry to misuse the blog, I couldn't find an active TOR forum.

Regards,
a TOR user

Anonymous (not verified) said:

July 31, 2013

Permalink

Hi,

I would appreciate it if Tor developers could clarify for us non-technical end-users the following scenarios:

(1) I first launch a VPN connection using TCP protocol. Next, I launch the Tor Browser Bundle and surf websites using the Tor Browser.

or

(2) I first launch the Tor Browser Bundle. Using the Tor Browser, I connect to my VPN service provider.

Which of the two above would provide more anonymity?