Tor Browser 3.6.1 is released

by mikeperry | May 7, 2014

The first pointfix release of the 3.6 series is available from the Tor Browser Project page and also from our distribution directory.

This release features a fix for a regression with using a proxy for normal Tor usage. It does not yet allow the configuration of proxies for pluggable transports. We hope to fix that issue in the following point release.

This is not a security release — feel free to keep using TBB 3.6 if it's working for you.

Here is the complete changelog:

All Platforms
- Update HTTPS-Everywhere to 3.5.1
- Update NoScript to 2.6.8.22
- Bug 11658: Fix proxy configuration for non-Pluggable Transports users
- Backport Pending Tor Patches:
  - Bug 8402: Allow Tor proxy configuration while PTs are present
- Note: The Pluggable Transports themselves have not been updated to support proxy configuration yet.

Comments

Please note that the comment area below has been archived.

Hi, is it possible to

Hi, is it possible to configure Tor Browser to change different proxies? I use Iceweasel with Foxy Proxy to use tor/i2p/no_proxy for different sites. Even if something leaks I use also vpn so I don't really care about it. Thanks

Proxy bypass is not the only

Proxy bypass is not the only worry you might have. See
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/projects/torbrowser/design/
for many other privacy issues that Tor Browser aims to resolve.

The short answer is "no, it makes it too easy for some other attacks, like linking between profiles, to happen." Maybe you don't care about these today, but in our experience people always seem to wish they'd had a bit more privacy in retrospect.

And to think that it was not

And to think that it was not /that/ long ago that Tails shipped with FoxyProxy...

"This is not a security

"This is not a security release."

So that would mean that users who feel content continuing to use 3.6 may do so safely, right?

If so, may I suggest that you state that explicitly in order to remove any possible doubt or ambiguity on the part of readers.

Good idea. Done.

Thank you.

Thank you, 3.6 work fine for

Thank you, 3.6 work fine for me.

Hi, i have a question: In

Hi,
i have a question:

In Tails "Maintain Offline Storage:Allow" is Default(Menu Bar:Page Info->Permissions).
Is it default in Tor Browser,too ?

Why not NoScript to

Why not NoScript to 2.6.8.23?

If PT adds an extra layer of encryption, making it harder to decipher, why not make all nodes PT?

I have just installed Tor

I have just installed Tor 3.6.1 and I would like to choose my IP address state but I can't find the Vidalia panel. How can I do?

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/do

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/faq#WhereDidVidaliaGo

This is what I got in the

This is what I got in the Terminal

/home/vidalia-standalone-0.2.21-gnu-linux-x86_64-1-en-US/start-vidalia: line 3: ./App/vidalia: No such file or directory

/home/vidalia-standalone-0.2.21-gnu-linux-x86_64-1-en-US/App/vidalia: cannot execute binary file

Tor Browser bundle Mac

Tor Browser bundle Mac version questions & remarks ,
tested version TorBrowser-3.6-osx32

I was Looking at the Tor browser application for the Mac, trying to analyze it a bit out of security curiosity, and I have some questions about it regarding security.
Not about the connections, not about the built in ESR Firefox, but actually about the Tor bundle application itself.

Local storage
For what I see The Tor browser bundle is not storing information in de local user library except for some preferences, like org.mozilla.torbrowser.plist, only when the application itself is installed on the mac. That's nice, but the consequence is that the information that usually is stored in the local library folder, like the cache directory and application support directory for the stored user profile, is in this case completely stored within the application bundle itself. About that I have some security questions.

Privilege escalation?
When the Tor application is installed in the Applications folder, as suggested by the installer, you are actually also moving local storage functionality to a higher admin privilege directory level. Is that a safe approach from a security perspective?
More specific, is it possible that the application would create possibilities for privilege escalation in case of virus or malware attacks? Just wondering if that possible issue has been discussed by the developers.

Read and write permissions?
The alternative could be to not run this bundle application from the standard Applications folder, but from another local user directory or even from a usb stick.
In that case the application itself maybe has less user rights within the system but is at the same time less protected itself because of the read and write permissions from a standard user account that are on the TorBrowser.app . And maybe therefor is more vulnerable for malware that would try attack the browser itself by changing the browser settings or library?
I was just wondering about that but, I am not a security expert, nor a developer.

Print as pdf storage location
Something else, did you notice or know that when printing a page as pdf file you have different options for storing that pdf. When you choose one of the standard options from the menu option of Safe PDF to Web Receipts Folder, the Torbrowser is actually storing the pdf file within the TorBrowser.app.
Is that on purpose?
I can imagine that it is a smart solution when you run the application from an usb stick, keeping all the files together, but did not see an explanation or manual for that so that people are aware where their possible lost pdf files are hiding. Hint, hint you app is growing, the way I found out.

Growing app size?
More app size growing? Why is the application size growing, even if you do not store pdf prints in the application bundle? The original application size after installation was something like 81,1 mb. Using and testing the application for some time it is already over 120 mb? Closing will downsize the application size a bit, something like 2 mb but it is still a lot bigger than using it the first several times.
What extra information is the bundle storing inside and also keeping after closing the application?

Hopefully someone knows the answers to these questions, and sorry if I did overlook some FAQ answer somewhere, its a lot of information. Could not get my questions and remarks shorter, sorry for that too.

Compliments for the application development, 3.6 is working stable on the Mac
and I'll try the 3.6.1 upgrade as well.
Thank you & best regards,

Re: Growing app size: Not

Re: Growing app size: Not sure why that is growing but we ship the bundle with a minimal profile only which gets filled with a lot of stuff pretty quickly. You might want to investigate that?

Re: Print as pdf storage location:
Yes, that is on purpose. The bundle is supposed to be self-contained.

Re: Read and write permissions/Privilege escalation:
Yes, we wanted to point the installer to ~/Desktop but we got feedback from Mac users that this is highly unusual, so we chose /Applications as almost all Mac programs do. That said see: https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/projects/torbrowser/design/#attacks point 4.

RE "Re: Growing app

RE "Re: Growing app size:"
Further investigation and comparison with the new installed 3.6.1 version made me found out that was mainly the cause of added extra addon's and some of their growing update subscriptions. For example addons like ABP or Ghostery have (off course) growing lists.
Newly installed 3.6.1 version size stay's around 99 or 100 mb.

Still investigating and thinking about the best place of installing the TorBrowser.app under Mac OS X. I'll post some more if I have an interesting considering opinion or alternative about that (I think I actually have but have to compare and investigate some more). Thanks for answering the questions.

I'm quite new to Tor, and I

I'm quite new to Tor, and I saw that the installer exe does not contain any information like file version, description etc.
Is there a reason for that?

Probably because nobody has

Probably because nobody has added it. Please help?

Is Tor browser no longer

Is Tor browser no longer self contained? as it seems to be loading windows system files which I don't recall it ever doing before.

At one point the files below wanted access which I denied:

C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Folders\MSONSEXT.DLL
C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Folders\msows409.dll

as it seemed more than a little odd to me, after restarting Tor and getting the same thing I disconnected.

I was using Tor 3.5.4 at the time, I have gone back to using an earlier version of Tor which doesn't use windows system files.

Any info appreciated.

Sounds like a new bug?

Sounds like a new bug? Please open a ticket on bugs.torproject.org and provide as much information as you can.

It is still supposed to be

It is still supposed to be self-contained and you are in fact the first user I am aware of reporting this problem. Might be some components on your system interfering here, hard to say without a further investigation...

I'm having an issue with

I'm having an issue with geoip6 file not found on

C:\Documents and Settings\\Datos de programa\tor\geoip6

That folder does not even exist.

And also, I've searched all over my hard drive for the geoip6 file and it's nowhere to be found.

This is

This is https://bugs.torproject.org/10425.

Posting from AC100, running

Posting from AC100, running a Cubieboard and a node on a Raspberry Pi:
Will there ever be a bundle for armhf?

I have configure all I know

I have configure all I know to make sure all the traffic go through Tor network, but how to test? can I see the leaking data?

On May 11th, 2014 Anonymous

On May 11th, 2014 Anonymous (me) had some security questions posted in a longer question (50 lines). Title: "Tor Browser bundle Mac version questions & remarks"
Is it still in moderation? Did you choose tot not place it for security reasons but are you working on these questions or solutions?
That would be nice & interesting to know (for me). Thank you in advance,
best regards, Anonymous.

We have ~1000 spam comments

We have ~1000 spam comments with a few actual comments mixed in. Every so often I go through them and delete most and approve the rest, but it's probably not a smart use of my time.

I recommend if you have an actual question and want an answer, to ask it through one of the recommended contact mechanisms:
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/about/contact

How can I store one cookie

How can I store one cookie in torbrowser?
The site I want to log in (and all other sites) doesnt store a cookie by itself, so I guess torbrowser blocks it?!
If somebody asked the same question, please just comment a link, I didnt find any helpful information by searching :(

TBB actually does allow

TBB actually does allow cookies -- it just discards them all when you exit.

But the interface for seeing them is broken:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10353

Does any layer of Tor

Does any layer of Tor support Perfect Forward Secrecy? what about Hidden Services? because according to Wikipedia "In cryptography, forward secrecy (also known as perfect forward secrecy or PFS[1]) is a property of key-agreement protocols ensuring that a session key derived from a set of long-term keys cannot be compromised if one of the long-term keys is compromised in the future. The key used to protect transmission of data must not be used to derive any additional keys, and if the key used to protect transmission of data is derived from some other keying material, then that material must not be used to derive any more keys. In this way, compromise of a single key permits access only to data protected by that single key."

Why yes, it

Why yes, it does.

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/faq#KeyManagement
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/documentation#UpToSpeed

Why do people keep asking this question?

Does that mean Heartbleed

Does that mean Heartbleed isn't going to be that much of an issue in the futur?

Well, maybe. If you meant

Well, maybe.

If you meant "does that mean future issues like heartbleed won't be a problem", then unfortunately no. The heartbleed vulnerability acted at a different level than whether a protocol has the perfect forward secrecy property. PFS is generally about what a *network* adversary can learn. The idea is that if "they" log traffic and later show up and ask you to decrypt it, you can't because you no longer have the key that was used for encrypting it. But if they can bust in and take your key, then things that happen later won't necessarily stay secure.

If you meant "does that mean that once people upgrade, the vulnerability called heartbleed won't be as much of an issue", then yes. There's still the worry that they did some successful attack in the past, but once people are upgraded, and once old identity keys have been thrown out (see https://ocewjwkdco.tudasnich.de/blog/openssl-bug-cve-2014-0160), we should be in pretty good shape.

Hello, question for the

Hello, question for the developers or anyone... I have been reading a lot about DNS Leaks and Tor, but I have not found a perfect answer to this yet: Does Tor Browser Bundle leak DNS? If yes, what is a good solution to this?

The short answer is "no, it

The short answer is "no, it doesn't."

The longer answer is "no, we hope it doesn't, and we've blocked all the issues we know about, but Firefox sure is complicated, so maybe we missed one. That's why everybody should audit it and report bugs if they find any."

You might like
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/projects/torbrowser/design/

When I checked the current

When I checked the current release via the video tutorial I got the message after I tried to check Erinn's signature via cmd.exe:

"C:\Users\My name\Desktop>gpg --keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x63FEE6
59
gpg: requesting key 63FEE659 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
gpg: key 63FEE659: "Erinn Clark " 10 new signatures
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new signatures: 10

What is the significance of TEN signatures and is this a problem for security?

It's fine. That gpg line you

It's fine. That gpg line you quote doesn't actually check the signature -- it fetches the key from the keyserver. You already had a cached copy of the key, but you fetched a new copy, and the new copy had more signatures (think of them as endorsements) than the copy you already had.

That said, I hope you're following that line up with another gpg line with --verify in it?
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/verifying-signatures

Arma Thanks for the

Arma

Thanks for the info.

Yes, I verify the signature and get the advice "Good signature".

But what about verifying the

But what about verifying the singing key itself?

Seems very few people actually do this.

Without verifying the signing key, is verifying a signature any better than simply verifying a SHA256 checksum obtained from an HTTPS authenticated site? (Providing one verifies the fingerprint of the cert.)

I thought that I was doing

I thought that I was doing enough by completeing successfully all the instructions on the video 'tutorial' released a short while ago and then 'cross-checking' that by also following the written instructions "How to verify signatures for packages" - but if there is something else that needs to be verified, please put the instructions up and most of us will gratefully follow them.

Mozilla recently announced

Mozilla recently announced it will be including a closed source module from Adobe in order to provide EME DRM-in-HTML support.

Will the torproject be removing it to ensure browser integrity and security? A statement on the future of the TBB would be welcomed. I personally feel that any closed source module should be omitted.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/mozilla-and-drm

See

See https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-May/032947.html and responses there. Apparently Firefox won't actually be including it, but rather they'll be including easy support for having it. So it should be easy to leave it out of Tor Browser, just like we leave Flash out of Tor Browser.

Thanks for the link. I

Thanks for the link.

I noticed one of the comments said it would still need to be installed like any other plugin which is good news. Early reports I read were a bit ambiguous and I got the impression it would be built into the browser wether you wanted it or not.

For everyday browsing it may not be a bad thing but for people on TOR, this DRM could most likely be used to fingerprint a user's browser.

I am new to the Tor browser

I am new to the Tor browser and have been reading all about it, tails and vpn. I also read that using Tor you should not download files. If I did this did I compromise my anonymity? and now using Tor from my IP address is now pointless?

There is no rule never to

There is no rule never to download files over Tor. Rather, there are certain critical precautions and caveats regarding doing so.

The main danger lies with OPENING files. As a rule, this should only be done while, at the very least, disconnected from the Internet. And unless one can be certain of the safety of a given file, it should only be opened within a live system (such as Tails) or a system that is never network-connected.

See
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/download/download-easy.html.en#warning

Also, for the sake of

Also, for the sake of minimizing congestion and bandwidth usage over the network, restraint is urged regarding downloading (or streaming, via HTML5) large files via Tor.

Please be mindful and

Please be mindful and considerate of the other Tor users.

I have recently, with TB

I have recently, with TB 3.6-beta-2, started to get
[warn] Proxy Client: unable to connect to 209.141.36.236:45496

and

[warn] Rejecting SOCKS request for anonymous connection to private address [scrubbed]

I do reach the internet, but what about privacy?

On Linux, both Fedora 19 and

On Linux, both Fedora 19 and Mint 13 and both 32 and 64 bit, the firefox browser sometimes hangs and never starts. strace -p shows that the firefox hang is due to FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE. The tor daemon always starts and works correctly which I verified with torsocks. This has been going on with at least the past 3 releases as well. I finally figured out how to debug it.

pdfjs.disabled; false Again?

pdfjs.disabled; false

Again? Is this a bad joke?

Are there any special

Are there any special precautions to take if you don't trust your ISP?

By default, your ISP controls both DNS and packets, so theoretically, they could set up fake Tor nodes, hijack your DNS request and maybe uncover a thing or two about your browsing habits. A proxy sort of moves the problem to some other company you have to trust.

Does Tor protect against this?
Can I read about how somewhere?

Yes. https://www.torproject.o

Yes.

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/faq#KeyManagement
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/about/overview
https://svn.torproject.org/svn/projects/articles/circumvention-features…

Look at source of Tor

Look at source of Tor daemon: src/or/config.c

static void
add_default_trusted_dir_authorities(dirinfo_type_t type)
{
int i;
const char *authorities[] = {
"moria1 orport=9101 no-v2 "
"v3ident=D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566 "
"128.31.0.39:9131 9695 DFC3 5FFE B861 329B 9F1A B04C 4639 7020 CE31",
"tor26 v1 orport=443 v3ident=14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4 "
"86.59.21.38:80 847B 1F85 0344 D787 6491 A548 92F9 0493 4E4E B85D",
"dizum orport=443 v3ident=E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58 "
"194.109.206.212:80 7EA6 EAD6 FD83 083C 538F 4403 8BBF A077 587D D755",
"Tonga orport=443 bridge no-v2 82.94.251.203:80 "
"4A0C CD2D DC79 9508 3D73 F5D6 6710 0C8A 5831 F16D",
"turtles orport=9090 no-v2 "
"v3ident=27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956 "
"76.73.17.194:9030 F397 038A DC51 3361 35E7 B80B D99C A384 4360 292B",
"gabelmoo orport=443 no-v2 "
"v3ident=ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226 "
"212.112.245.170:80 F204 4413 DAC2 E02E 3D6B CF47 35A1 9BCA 1DE9 7281",
"dannenberg orport=443 no-v2 "
"v3ident=585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A "
"193.23.244.244:80 7BE6 83E6 5D48 1413 21C5 ED92 F075 C553 64AC 7123",
"urras orport=80 no-v2 v3ident=80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C "
"208.83.223.34:443 0AD3 FA88 4D18 F89E EA2D 89C0 1937 9E0E 7FD9 4417",
"maatuska orport=80 no-v2 "
"v3ident=49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B "
"171.25.193.9:443 BD6A 8292 55CB 08E6 6FBE 7D37 4836 3586 E46B 3810",
"Faravahar orport=443 no-v2 "
"v3ident=EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97 "
"154.35.32.5:80 CF6D 0AAF B385 BE71 B8E1 11FC 5CFF 4B47 9237 33BC",
NULL
};

There is up-to 9 hardcoded nodes. Each node represent as nickname / IP Address / Public Key Fingerprint.

Your provider shall have all 9 private keys to hijack and cheat your fresh first start of Tor daemon.

If you are already a Tor user for a long time, you probably can find on the hard disk:

/var/lib/tor/cached-descriptors.new

Full Tor-Network with all IP addresses and Public Keys corresponding for its.

Your provider shall have all private keys of all Tor-Network, in other way your Tor daemon will warn you in the /var/log/tor/notices.log. And probably will not work.

A continuing problem seems

A continuing problem seems to be incorrect or non-existant Family Entries on some Tor-router families.

I have read some about

I have read some about serious rumours with GCM try to pushed by NSA engineers.
Is this a problem with Tor, too?

Since 24 hours I can no

Since 24 hours I can no longer access the Internet with the TorBrowser: no connection. However, JonDoBrowser, Firefox & SeaMonkey work flawlessly, even TorBirdy works without problems. Does anyone have an idea or even information what it could be? I have changed neither the network settings nor the preferences of the browser or the firewall - settings.

I'm using Mac 10.6.8 with Tor Browser 3.6.1 - 32 bit.

"Sophos Antivirus for Mac"

"Sophos Antivirus for Mac" was the wrongdoer. In had to uninstall it, now everything is fine.

I am also having the same

I am also having the same problem... not sure yet what's causing it. A solution would be nice.

For all the unhappy osx

For all the unhappy osx users out there, apparently the issue is that your Sophos antivirus software quietly updated itself in place, and the new one accidentally considers Tor Browser to be scary.
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/faq#SophosOnMac

Hey where can I find the

Hey where can I find the chrome/icons/default folder in order to change the main window icons so that people cant tell I'm using Tor just by seeing my icon? - Thanks.

No idea if this is what you

No idea if this is what you want, but my Tor Browser Bundle directory has a Browser/browser/chrome/icons/default/ directory in it. I assume yours does too.

"Firefox is already running,

"Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system"
This crap happens sometimes when I start the browser. I try to start it, and nothing happens. I eventually try again and receive the message.

Fix please?

""Firefox is already

""Firefox is already running, but is not responding.[...]"

I've had this sometimes w/ my regular (non-Tor) Firefox.

In GNU/Linux, I've sometimes had success w/ issuing the command, "killall firefox" (without the quotation marks), and then starting Firefox.

For TBB, you may have to try, "killall tor" as well.

I urgently need help with

I urgently need help with Tor. I am on dial-up, not by choice. In spite of that, Tor used to work reasonably well for me. With the last few updates, over a period of a year or so, my ability to build a working Tor circuit has gradually and steadily decreased. Sometimes it still works, but most of the time not. What now usually happens is Tor will spend many hours very slowly loading relay descriptors. Eventually it will simply stop progressing. There are no error messages. It just never gets any further. It stops at an arbitrary point, usually 50 or 60 or 70 per cent or anywhere in-between. I have let it run overnight like this with no further progress. Many megabytes of data continue to be downloaded through various ports, but no more descriptors are ever found.

I am not a computer novice and I know how to configure Tor correctly, but my technical knowledge is limited and I have no idea whatsoever what is going on here. I have asked for help on or-talk but my request was ignored. There doesn’t seem to be a lot of interest there in helping ordinary users.

I don’t know where else to turn. As things stand, Tor has become unusable to me and I miss it very much. I would be very grateful for any help with this I can get.

Sounds like an interesting

Sounds like an interesting bug. I recommend learning more about the directory system, and opening a ticket with as many details as you can find. The key is to produce as simple a situation as possible that allows a developer to reproduce your issue.

As for wanting to help ordinary users, tor-talk and all the other lists are flooded. We have millions of users now. Please help!

For having anonimity isn't

For having anonimity isn't enough to configure my web browser to connect to the TOR process? Is it really necessary to use TorBrowser?

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/do

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/docs/faq#TBBOtherBrowser

https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/projects/torbrowser/design/

You will very likely screw up your anonymity if you don't use Tor Browser.

I need help. I am TI. I am

I need help. I am TI. I am 49 YEAR old grandmother never done anything. wro.g This is. my 27th phone. Everything is controlled and shut off. My whole life is being shit off. I can't look for work without internet. I have partial onion on this but the phone on another network and they take control. It is connected to wifi mac and blietootj unknown. This phone 8328402188 straight talk. meid 268435461212996697. No one will help me.

authority 'maatuska' at

authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 02:47:47.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 02:58:01.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 02:59:12.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 03:19:26.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 03:28:26.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
fixme:toolhelp:CreateToolhelp32Snapshot Unimplemented: heap list snapshot
fixme:toolhelp:Heap32ListFirst : stub
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 03:39:44.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 04:00:26.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 04:21:26.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 04:29:25.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
fixme:toolhelp:CreateToolhelp32Snapshot Unimplemented: heap list snapshot
fixme:toolhelp:Heap32ListFirst : stub
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 04:41:48.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 05:02:09.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 05:22:29.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 05:30:31.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
fixme:toolhelp:CreateToolhelp32Snapshot Unimplemented: heap list snapshot
fixme:toolhelp:Heap32ListFirst : stub
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 05:43:13.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 06:04:11.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'tor26' at 86.59.21.38:80 (contact Peter Palfrader; identity 14C131DFC5C6F93646BE72FA1401C02A8DF2E8B4)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'turtles' at 76.73.17.194:9030 (contact Mike Perry ; identity 27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'maatuska' at 171.25.193.9:443 (contact 4096R/23291265 Linus Nordberg ; identity 49015F787433103580E3B66A1707A00E60F2D15B)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dannenberg' at dannenberg.torauth.de:80 (contact Andreas Lehner ; identity 585769C78764D58426B8B52B6651A5A71137189A)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'urras' at 208.83.223.34:443 (contact 4096R/4193A197 Jacob Appelbaum ; identity 80550987E1D626E3EBA5E5E75A458DE0626D088C)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'moria1' at 128.31.0.34:9131 (contact 1024D/28988BF5 arma mit edu; identity D586D18309DED4CD6D57C18FDB97EFA96D330566)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'dizum' at 194.109.206.212:80 (contact 1024R/8D56913D Alex de Joode ; identity E8A9C45EDE6D711294FADF8E7951F4DE6CA56B58)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'gabelmoo' at 212.112.245.170:80 (contact 4096R/C5AA446D Sebastian Hahn ; identity ED03BB616EB2F60BEC80151114BB25CEF515B226)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] Looks like we need to download a new certificate from authority 'Faravahar' at 154.35.32.5:80 (contact 0x0B47D56D Sina Rabbani (inf0) ; identity EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97)
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [warn] A consensus needs 5 good signatures from recognized authorities for us to accept it. This one has 0 (). We were unable to check 9 of the signatures, because we were missing the keys.
Jul 19 06:24:46.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information, but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
????????????????????? :O

I suggest you ask for help

I suggest you ask for help on some of the more useful help channels, like irc or the helpdesk.
https://sedvblmbog.tudasnich.de/about/contact